How to Subscribe
Author Information
Special Issues and Monographs
Advertising in Journals
Copyright Permissions
How to Propose a New Journal
Become a Reviewer
Journal Access in Developing Countries
Frequently Asked Questions
Journal Statistics
Contact the Journals Department
About Us
A-Z Journals List
Engaging hard to engage clients: A Q methodological study involving clinical psychologists
Authors: Lister, Matthew1; Gardner, Damian2
Source: Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, Volume 79, Number 3, September 2006 , pp. 419-443(25)
- In this Subject: Neurology & Psychiatry , Psychology
- By this author: Lister, Matthew ; Gardner, Damian
Abstract:
This research uses Q methodology to collate a number of techniques, and to investigate what techniques are used to encourage engagement across a number of clinical psychology specialities. Eleven groups of participants from different clinical specialities were interviewed in order to develop a set of 51 statements reflecting engagement techniques that clinicians felt that they were likely to use with 'hard to engage' clients. Seventy-five participants from a similar range of specialities were then asked to Q sort these statements and provide other demographic information. Forty-four participants returned completed Q sorts which were factor analysed by a tailored program (PQ Method) to investigate how the statements fall into patterns that reflect ways clinicians approach engagement. Varimax rotation produced five factors, four of which were able to be interpreted by participant information and comments. These accounts were taken back to some of the initial participants for 'reflexive correction' (Stainton Rogers, 1995). The four factor patterns are discussed in relation to existing literature and the research questions. These identified factors are: (i) the client focused approach; (ii) the interpersonal professional; (iii) the 'eclectic' or systemic approach; (iv) the expert listener. The implications for training, clinical practice and research are discussed.Document Type: Research article
DOI: 10.1348/147608305X59949
Affiliations: 1: Oxfordshire Mental Healthcare NHS Trust, UK 2: Northampton Healthcare Trust, UK
The requested document is freely available to subscribers. Users without a subscription can purchase this article.
- Sign in below if you have already registered for online access
Sign in