Engaging hard to engage clients: A Q methodological study involving clinical psychologists

Authors: Lister, Matthew1; Gardner, Damian2

Source: Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, Volume 79, Number 3, September 2006 , pp. 419-443(25)

Purchase options

Article Access Options

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$24.40 plus tax      Refund Policy

OR

 
More like this?

Abstract:

This research uses Q methodology to collate a number of techniques, and to investigate what techniques are used to encourage engagement across a number of clinical psychology specialities. Eleven groups of participants from different clinical specialities were interviewed in order to develop a set of 51 statements reflecting engagement techniques that clinicians felt that they were likely to use with 'hard to engage' clients. Seventy-five participants from a similar range of specialities were then asked to Q sort these statements and provide other demographic information. Forty-four participants returned completed Q sorts which were factor analysed by a tailored program (PQ Method) to investigate how the statements fall into patterns that reflect ways clinicians approach engagement. Varimax rotation produced five factors, four of which were able to be interpreted by participant information and comments. These accounts were taken back to some of the initial participants for 'reflexive correction' (Stainton Rogers, 1995). The four factor patterns are discussed in relation to existing literature and the research questions. These identified factors are: (i) the client focused approach; (ii) the interpersonal professional; (iii) the 'eclectic' or systemic approach; (iv) the expert listener. The implications for training, clinical practice and research are discussed.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1348/147608305X59949

Affiliations: 1: Oxfordshire Mental Healthcare NHS Trust, UK 2: Northampton Healthcare Trust, UK

The requested document is freely available to subscribers. Users without a subscription can purchase this article.

Sign in



 

 

Back to top


Journals Home | Accessibility | Text Only | Site Map | Contact Us | BPS Website

© Copyright 2000-2008 The British Psychological Society
The British Psychological Society is a charity registered in England and Wales, Registration Number : 229642 and a charity registered in Scotland, Registration Number : SC039452 - VAT Registration Number : 240 3937 76

End Page