Further data on interrogative suggestibility and compliance scores following instructed malingering

Authors: Ingo Hansen, Tom Smeets and Marko Jelicic

Source: Legal and Criminological Psychology

Publisher: British Psychological Society

Abstract:

Purpose This study examined whether people can successfully feign high levels of interrogative suggestibility and compliance as measured by the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales (GSS) and the Gudjonsson Compliance Scale (GCS) when given instructions to malinger. Methods Participants (N=90) were randomly allocated to one of three groups that received: (1) instructions to give into leading questions in order to look vulnerable to suggestions, (2) instructions to be compliant with the examiner, or (3) the standard GSS/GCS instructions. Results One of the two malingering instructions led to modestly elevated scores of total suggestibility, while subscales remained unaffected. In contrast, both malingering groups obtained highly elevated compliance scores. Conclusions These findings suggest that heightened suggestibility is rather difficult to malinger, thereby confirming the reliability of the GSS. On the other hand, it might be easier to malingering compliance as measured with the self-report GCS.

Document Type:

DOI: 10.1348/135532509X447796

The full text article is not available for purchase.

The publisher only permits individual articles to be downloaded by subscribers.


Journals Home | Accessibility | Text Only | Site Map | Contact Us | BPS Website

© Copyright 2000-2008 The British Psychological Society
The British Psychological Society is a charity registered in England and Wales, Registration Number : 229642 and a charity registered in Scotland, Registration Number : SC039452 - VAT Registration Number : 240 3937 76

End Page