Further data on interrogative suggestibility and compliance scores following instructed malingering
Authors: Ingo Hansen, Tom Smeets and Marko Jelicic
Source: Legal and Criminological Psychology
Publisher: British Psychological Society
Abstract:
Purpose This study examined whether people can successfully feign high levels of interrogative suggestibility and compliance as measured by the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales (GSS) and the Gudjonsson Compliance Scale (GCS) when given instructions to malinger. Methods Participants (N=90) were randomly allocated to one of three groups that received: (1) instructions to give into leading questions in order to look vulnerable to suggestions, (2) instructions to be compliant with the examiner, or (3) the standard GSS/GCS instructions. Results One of the two malingering instructions led to modestly elevated scores of total suggestibility, while subscales remained unaffected. In contrast, both malingering groups obtained highly elevated compliance scores. Conclusions These findings suggest that heightened suggestibility is rather difficult to malinger, thereby confirming the reliability of the GSS. On the other hand, it might be easier to malingering compliance as measured with the self-report GCS.Document Type:
DOI: 10.1348/135532509X447796
The full text article is not available for purchase.
The publisher only permits individual articles to be downloaded by subscribers.