Essentialist beliefs about social categories

Authors: Haslam N.; Rothschild L.; Ernst D.

Source: British Journal of Social Psychology, Volume 39, Number 1, March 2000 , pp. 113-127(15)

Purchase options

Article Access Options

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$24.40 plus tax      Refund Policy

OR

 
More like this?
Article access options

Post to: del.icio.us Furl CiteUlike Connotea Bibsonomy

Abstract:

This study examines beliefs about the ontological status of social categories, asking whether their members are understood to share fixed, inhering essences or natures. Forty social categories were rated on nine elements of essentialism. These elements formed two independent dimensions, representing the degrees to which categories are understood as natural kinds and as coherent entities with inhering cores ('entitativity' or reification), respectively. Reification was negatively associated with categories evaluative status, especially among those categories understood to be natural kinds. Essentialism is not a unitary syndrome of social beliefs, and is not monolithically associated with devaluation and prejudice, but it illuminates several aspects of social categorization.

Language: English

Document Type: Research article

The requested document is freely available to subscribers. Users without a subscription can purchase this article.

Sign in



 

 

Back to top

Journals Home | Accessibility | Text Only | Site Map | Contact Us | BPS Website

© Copyright 2000-2008 The British Psychological Society
The British Psychological Society is a charity registered in England and Wales, Registration Number : 229642 and a charity registered in Scotland, Registration Number : SC039452 - VAT Registration Number : 240 3937 76

End Page