Planning health behaviour change: Comparing the behavioural influence of two types of self-regulatory planning

Authors: Liesbeth van Osch, Astrid Reubsaet, Lilian Lechner, Mariëlle Beenackers, Math Candel and Hein de Vries

Source: British Journal of Health Psychology

Publisher: British Psychological Society

Abstract:

Objectives Recent efforts in health psychology to bridge the gap between individuals' intentions and behaviour have centered on the influence of planning strategies. This study investigated the impact of two commonly used types of self-regulatory planning in the prediction of health promoting behaviour. Design This study employed a prospective longitudinal design. Three measurements were implemented in order to assess associations between various socio-cognitive determinants, planning, and health behaviour. Methods Structural equation modelling (N=572) was used to compare the value of preparatory planning, i.e. the planning of strategies and preparatory actions towards a goal behaviour, and implemental planning, i.e. the planning of when, where, and how to perform a goal behaviour, in the prediction of fruit consumption. Results Both preparatory planning (ß=0.21; p<.001) and implemental planning (ß=0.13; p<.01) were significant predictors of fruit consumption, over and above the influence of motivational factors. Comparison of differences in explained variance (ΔR2) indicated that the contribution of preparatory planning was larger than that of implemental planning (z=2.19; p<.05). Implemental planning did not contribute to the prediction of fruit consumption over and above the influence of preparatory planning when tested simultaneously. Conclusions The results provide a first indication that the planning of strategic preparatory actions may be more influential in predicting health behaviour than implemental planning, focusing on when, where, and how to enact goal-directed behaviour. Implications of the results and suggestions for future research are outlined.

Document Type:

DOI: 10.1348/135910709X436723

The full text article is not available for purchase.

The publisher only permits individual articles to be downloaded by subscribers.


Journals Home | Accessibility | Text Only | Site Map | Contact Us | BPS Website

© Copyright 2000-2008 The British Psychological Society
The British Psychological Society is a charity registered in England and Wales, Registration Number : 229642 and a charity registered in Scotland, Registration Number : SC039452 - VAT Registration Number : 240 3937 76

End Page