Author: Butler, Ruth¹

Source: British Journal of Educational Psychology, Volume 76, Number 3, September 2006 , pp. 595-611(17)

More about this publication?

• Also avaliable:
  British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series II - Psychological Aspects of Education - Current Trends
  Number 1 - Learning and Teaching Reading
  Number 2 - Development and Motivation: Joint Perspectives
  Number 3 - Pedagogy - Teaching for Learning
  Number 4 - Student Learning and University Teaching
  Number 5 - Learning through Digital Technologies
  For more information about the Monograph series click here
• Information for Authors
• Submit a Paper
• Subscribe to this Title
• BJEP Monograph Series

More like this?

• In this Subject: Education
• By this author: Butler, Ruth

Abstract:

Aims. The aims of this research were to examine the predictions that (a) the kind of evaluation pupils anticipate will influence their initial achievement goals and, as a result, the quality and consequences of task engagement; and (b) initial mastery goals will promote new learning and intrinsic motivation and initial ability goals will promote entity beliefs that ability is fixed.

Sample. Participants were 312 secondary school pupils at ages 13-15.

Methods. Pupils expected to receive normative evaluation, temporal evaluation (scores over time) or no evaluation. Mastery and ability goals were measured before pupils worked on challenging problems; intrinsic motivation and entity beliefs were measured after task completion.

Results. Anticipation of temporal evaluation enhanced initial mastery goals, anticipation of normative evaluation enhanced ability goals and the no-evaluation condition undermined both. Anticipation of temporal evaluation enhanced new learning (strategy acquisition and performance gains) and intrinsic motivation both directly and by enhancing initial mastery goals; anticipation of normative evaluation enhanced entity beliefs by enhancing ability goals.

Conclusions. Results confirmed that evaluation conveys potent cues as to the goals of activity. They also challenged claims that both mastery and ability goals can be adaptive by demonstrating that these were differentially associated with positive versus negative processes and outcomes. Results have theoretical and applied implications for understanding and improving evaluative practices and student motivation.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1348/000709905X52319

Affiliations: 1: School of Education, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel

User name

 

Password

 

 

Remember me

 

 

 

• forgotten your password?
• Sign in via Athens