Authors: DeBacker, Teresa K.¹; Crowson, H. Michael¹

Source: British Journal of Educational Psychology, Volume 76, Number 3, September 2006 , pp. 535-551(17)

More about this publication?

• Also avaliable:
  British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series II - Psychological Aspects of Education - Current Trends
  Number 1 - Learning and Teaching Reading
  Number 2 - Development and Motivation: Joint Perspectives
  Number 3 - Pedagogy - Teaching for Learning
  Number 4 - Student Learning and University Teaching
  Number 5 - Learning through Digital Technologies
  For more information about the Monograph series click here
• Information for Authors
• Submit a Paper
• Subscribe to this Title
• BJEP Monograph Series

More like this?

• In this Subject: Education
• By this author: DeBacker, Teresa K. ;  Crowson, H. Michael

Abstract:

Background. Research indicates that achievement goals influence cognitive engagement, which, in turn, influences academic achievement. We believe that there are other individual difference variables in the realm of personal epistemology that may also directly or indirectly influence cognitive engagement; specifically, epistemological beliefs and epistemological motives (e.g. need for closure).

Aims. This study proposed and tested a conceptual model of relationships among epistemological variables (epistemological beliefs and need for closure), achievement goals (mastery, performance-approach, performance-avoidance) and cognitive engagement.

Sample. Two hundred and fifty-nine students attending university in the US volunteered to participate in the study. Students represented a variety of academic disciplines and ranged from 18 to 58 years.

Methods. The participants completed three paper-and-pencil surveys: the Epistemological Beliefs Inventory; the Attitudes, Beliefs, and Experiences Inventory (a measure of need for closure); and the Approaches to Learning Survey (a measure of achievement goals and cognitive engagement).

Results. Structural equation modelling supported the model in general, although not all proposed paths were significant. Correlational analyses further indicated that epistemological beliefs and need for closure are both potentially important variables for understanding learners' treatment of knowledge in instructional settings.

Conclusions. There are individual differences in epistemological beliefs and motives that may influence the goals students pursue in learning settings and the nature of their cognitive engagement.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1348/000709905X53138

Affiliations: 1: University of Oklahoma, USA

User name

 

Password

 

 

Remember me

 

 

 

• forgotten your password?
• Sign in via Athens